Perhaps the most relevant statistics data that we could gather is presented here:
| Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
|---|---|---|
| Website load speed | Approximately 4.84 seconds | It takes too long to load the website – we would suggest the webmaster to look into it. |
| Rank by Alexa | 653,714 | We are not fans of the Alexa rank, but if we base our assumptions on it, the website is not that popular. |
| Global rank by Quantcast | 126,416, after last update | Based on the gathered data, Quantcast does not consider this website to be popular. Take it for what it's worth. |
| Server data | Server seems to be online. IP adress for this domain is 58.158.177.102. | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. |
The basic overview not enough? Let's dive deeper.
Alexa, perhaps the oldest ranking system of its sort, bases it's website rating on approximated number of visitors of a specific page. In other words, the more visitors, the higher the global and local ranks. As of recently, Alexa has well over four million websites ranked. Having said all that, Alexa rank should be taken with a grain of salt. Or a massive bucketload. In other words, we think it to be greatly overrated, as it never takes into account how popular a website is within its niche.
QUANTCAST is very similar to Alexa, though perhaps enjoys an overall better user opinion even if, by comparison, the data processing company's rank index is smaller. The main interest of QUANTCAST is real-time audience analysis, so again the rank is based on traffic. QUANTCAST gathers this data mainly for advertising purposes of other companies. We know that, so far, QUANTCAST has ranked 85,312,034 websites, give or take a few. With all of this said, Quantcast rank is not really any more useful than that of Alexa and most similar ranking systems. Few of them, if any, take context into account and rate websites purely on traffic numbers (guesstimated, in so many cases). It's by far not the most accurate representation of a website's worth.
What is a server? It's basically a physical storage device (one that, sometimes, makes up several virtual servers for the cheaper shared hosting) that holds all the files and databases associated with a specific website or websites. Obviously, it's a touch more complicated than that (servers also have processors), but the essence is quite simple - your browser contacts the server, which then sends all the neccessary information and files to your computer. Each physical server has a unique IP address assigned to it, too, for easy recognition.
If you need more raw data, here's what we managed to gather:
| Header information |
|---|
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 12:06:07 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.6 (CentOS) OpenSSL/1.0.1e-fips Last-Modified: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:48:40 GMT ETag: "9-525c24c725e00" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 |
| WHOIS entry |
|---|
Domain : usr.sh Status : Live Expiry : 2018-03-08 NS 1 : ns1.value-domain.com NS 2 : ns2.value-domain.com NS 3 : ns4.value-domain.com NS 4 : ns3.value-domain.com NS 5 : ns5.value-domain.com Owner Name : Whois Privacy Protection Service by VALUE-DOMAIN Owner OrgName : Whois Privacy Protection Service by VALUE-DOMAIN Owner Addr : Ofuka-cho 3-1 Grand Front Osaka Tower B 23F Owner Addr : Osaka-shi Kita-ku Owner Addr : Osaka Owner Addr : JP Check for 'usr.ac' --- http://www.nic.ac/go/whois/usr.ac Check for 'usr.io' --- http://www.nic.io/go/whois/usr.io |
Typos are not uncommon, not even with website addresses. More than that, the more popular the website, the more typos there tend to happen. We have gathered and generated the following list of most frequently encountered mistypes for usr.sh:
Here is a list of some more reports for you to check. If you found this one on usr.sh useful, the following list will be of interest to you, too:
This list contains 370 top level domain variantions for usr.sh domain name: