Perhaps the most relevant statistics data that we could gather is presented here:
| Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
|---|---|---|
| Site title (meta) | photoship.co.uk - / | Sticking to between 50-60 characters for meta title length is a good idea. The length of this website's meta title is 19. |
| Website meta description | Old ship pictures jpg images postcards WW1 WW2 victory liberty empire troopships standard wartime types SS steamships MS motorships MV motor vessel maritime HMS watercolour artist Tony Westmore painting gallery | The length of the meta description is 210 characters. Google recommends up to around 280-320 characters at the most. |
| Website load speed | Approximately 1.5432 seconds | It takes too long to load the website – we would suggest the webmaster to look into it. |
| Rank by Alexa | 934,987 | We are not fans of the Alexa rank, but if we base our assumptions on it, the website is not that popular. |
| Global rank by Quantcast | 49,127, after last update | According to Quantcast metris, the website is quite popular. |
| Homepage links | Approximately 1 | Such an amount of links on a homepage might raise a question or two. |
| Size of page HTML | 0.2KB | If it were up to us, we'd urge the webmaster to improve. The result isn't very good, you see. Just saying. |
| Server data | Server seems to be online. IP adress for this domain is 185.43.77.30. | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. |
The basic overview not enough? Let's dive deeper.
Website safety is a key factor that should not be underestimated. After all, our computers and personal information stored on them are not as secure as one might think - the recent flaws found in microprocessors only confirm this. There is more than one source for finding out if a website is safe to visit or not, some more dependable than others. In this section we'll try to cover all the bases, if at all possible.
Alexa, perhaps the oldest ranking system of its sort, bases it's website rating on approximated number of visitors of a specific page. In other words, the more visitors, the higher the global and local ranks. As of recently, Alexa has well over four million websites ranked. Having said all that, Alexa rank should be taken with a grain of salt. Or a massive bucketload. In other words, we think it to be greatly overrated, as it never takes into account how popular a website is within its niche.
QUANTCAST is very similar to Alexa, though perhaps enjoys an overall better user opinion even if, by comparison, the data processing company's rank index is smaller. The main interest of QUANTCAST is real-time audience analysis, so again the rank is based on traffic. QUANTCAST gathers this data mainly for advertising purposes of other companies. We know that, so far, QUANTCAST has ranked 124,870,820 websites, give or take a few. With all of this said, Quantcast rank is not really any more useful than that of Alexa and most similar ranking systems. Few of them, if any, take context into account and rate websites purely on traffic numbers (guesstimated, in so many cases). It's by far not the most accurate representation of a website's worth.
What is a server? It's basically a physical storage device (one that, sometimes, makes up several virtual servers for the cheaper shared hosting) that holds all the files and databases associated with a specific website or websites. Obviously, it's a touch more complicated than that (servers also have processors), but the essence is quite simple - your browser contacts the server, which then sends all the neccessary information and files to your computer. Each physical server has a unique IP address assigned to it, too, for easy recognition.
If you need more raw data, here's what we managed to gather:
| Header information |
|---|
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5 X-Powered-By: ASP.NET X-Powered-By-Plesk: PleskWin Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:49:25 GMT Content-Length: 210 |
| WHOIS entry |
|---|
Error for "photoship.co.uk". the WHOIS query quota for 62.75.137.71 has been exceeded and will be replenished in 2188 seconds WHOIS lookup made at 10:19:34 17-May-2017 -- This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are: Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017. You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms, which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time. |
Typos are not uncommon, not even with website addresses. More than that, the more popular the website, the more typos there tend to happen. We have gathered and generated the following list of most frequently encountered mistypes for photoship.co.uk:
Here is a list of some more reports for you to check. If you found this one on photoship.co.uk useful, the following list will be of interest to you, too:
This list contains 370 top level domain variantions for photoship.co.uk domain name: