Perhaps the most relevant statistics data that we could gather is presented here:
| Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
|---|---|---|
| Site title (meta) | jj's USEFUL and UGLY pages | Sticking to between 50-60 characters for meta title length is a good idea. The length of this website's meta title is 26. |
| Website meta description | the ugly and useful homepage of Joerg Arndt | The length of the meta description is 43 characters. Google recommends up to around 280-320 characters at the most. |
| Metadata keywords | fxt, algorithms, mathematics, hfloat, ugly, useful | Oh. It's unexpected, to put it mildly, to see meta keywords still being used. After all, they are no longer a ranking factor and associate with spam more than anything else. |
| Website load speed | Approximately 0.0664 seconds | Website load speed is on a good level, great! But if an improvement can be made, it's always for the better. |
| Rank by Alexa | 959,111 | We are not fans of the Alexa rank, but if we base our assumptions on it, the website is not that popular. |
| Global rank by Quantcast | 490,457, after last update | Based on the gathered data, Quantcast does not consider this website to be popular. Take it for what it's worth. |
| Homepage links | Approximately 34 | A good amount of links and nothing to worry about. |
| Size of page HTML | 5.5KB | This is a very good result, as search engines prioritize websites that are quick to load. |
| Server data | Server seems to be online. IP adress for this domain is 80.81.252.139. | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. |
The basic overview not enough? Let's dive deeper.
Website safety is a key factor that should not be underestimated. After all, our computers and personal information stored on them are not as secure as one might think - the recent flaws found in microprocessors only confirm this. There is more than one source for finding out if a website is safe to visit or not, some more dependable than others. In this section we'll try to cover all the bases, if at all possible.
Alexa, perhaps the oldest ranking system of its sort, bases it's website rating on approximated number of visitors of a specific page. In other words, the more visitors, the higher the global and local ranks. As of recently, Alexa has well over four million websites ranked. Having said all that, Alexa rank should be taken with a grain of salt. Or a massive bucketload. In other words, we think it to be greatly overrated, as it never takes into account how popular a website is within its niche.
QUANTCAST is very similar to Alexa, though perhaps enjoys an overall better user opinion even if, by comparison, the data processing company's rank index is smaller. The main interest of QUANTCAST is real-time audience analysis, so again the rank is based on traffic. QUANTCAST gathers this data mainly for advertising purposes of other companies. We know that, so far, QUANTCAST has ranked 32,386,272 websites, give or take a few. With all of this said, Quantcast rank is not really any more useful than that of Alexa and most similar ranking systems. Few of them, if any, take context into account and rate websites purely on traffic numbers (guesstimated, in so many cases). It's by far not the most accurate representation of a website's worth.
What is a server? It's basically a physical storage device (one that, sometimes, makes up several virtual servers for the cheaper shared hosting) that holds all the files and databases associated with a specific website or websites. Obviously, it's a touch more complicated than that (servers also have processors), but the essence is quite simple - your browser contacts the server, which then sends all the neccessary information and files to your computer. Each physical server has a unique IP address assigned to it, too, for easy recognition.
If you need more raw data, here's what we managed to gather:
| Header information |
|---|
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: nginx/1.8.1 Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 08:29:14 GMT Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 5395 Last-Modified: Sun, 24 May 2015 06:29:31 GMT Connection: keep-alive Vary: Accept-Encoding ETag: "55616fcb-1513" Accept-Ranges: bytes |
| WHOIS entry |
|---|
Domain: jjj.de Nserver: ns1.domaindiscount24.net Nserver: ns2.domaindiscount24.net Nserver: ns3.domaindiscount24.net Status: connect Changed: 2014-07-19T08:32:44+02:00 [Tech-C] Type: PERSON Name: Stefan Reinauer Organisation: coresystems GmbH Address: Brahmsstr. 16 PostalCode: 79104 City: Freiburg CountryCode: DE Phone: +49-7617668825 Fax: +49-7617668825 Email: Changed: 2008-03-20T09:25:52+01:00 [Zone-C] Type: PERSON Name: Stefan Reinauer Organisation: coresystems GmbH Address: Brahmsstr. 16 PostalCode: 79104 City: Freiburg CountryCode: DE Phone: +49-7617668825 Fax: +49-7617668825 Email: Changed: 2008-03-20T09:25:52+01:00 |
Typos are not uncommon, not even with website addresses. More than that, the more popular the website, the more typos there tend to happen. We have gathered and generated the following list of most frequently encountered mistypes for jjj.de:
Here is a list of some more reports for you to check. If you found this one on jjj.de useful, the following list will be of interest to you, too:
This list contains 370 top level domain variantions for jjj.de domain name: