Perhaps the most relevant statistics data that we could gather is presented here:
| Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
|---|---|---|
| Website load speed | Approximately 1.9623 seconds | It takes too long to load the website – we would suggest the webmaster to look into it. |
| Rank by Alexa | 438,372 | We are not fans of the Alexa rank, but if we base our assumptions on it, the website is not that popular. |
| Global rank by Quantcast | 927,842, after last update | Based on the gathered data, Quantcast does not consider this website to be popular. Take it for what it's worth. |
| Size of page HTML | 0.2KB | If it were up to us, we'd urge the webmaster to improve. The result isn't very good, you see. Just saying. |
| Server data | Server seems to be online. IP adress for this domain is 177.87.136.7. | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. |
The basic overview not enough? Let's dive deeper.
Alexa, perhaps the oldest ranking system of its sort, bases it's website rating on approximated number of visitors of a specific page. In other words, the more visitors, the higher the global and local ranks. As of recently, Alexa has well over four million websites ranked. Having said all that, Alexa rank should be taken with a grain of salt. Or a massive bucketload. In other words, we think it to be greatly overrated, as it never takes into account how popular a website is within its niche.
QUANTCAST is very similar to Alexa, though perhaps enjoys an overall better user opinion even if, by comparison, the data processing company's rank index is smaller. The main interest of QUANTCAST is real-time audience analysis, so again the rank is based on traffic. QUANTCAST gathers this data mainly for advertising purposes of other companies. We know that, so far, QUANTCAST has ranked 185,906,734 websites, give or take a few. With all of this said, Quantcast rank is not really any more useful than that of Alexa and most similar ranking systems. Few of them, if any, take context into account and rate websites purely on traffic numbers (guesstimated, in so many cases). It's by far not the most accurate representation of a website's worth.
What is a server? It's basically a physical storage device (one that, sometimes, makes up several virtual servers for the cheaper shared hosting) that holds all the files and databases associated with a specific website or websites. Obviously, it's a touch more complicated than that (servers also have processors), but the essence is quite simple - your browser contacts the server, which then sends all the neccessary information and files to your computer. Each physical server has a unique IP address assigned to it, too, for easy recognition.
If you need more raw data, here's what we managed to gather:
| Header information |
|---|
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 18:57:42 GMT Server: Apache X-Xss-Protection: 1; mode=block Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=2592000 X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff Last-Modified: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:12:52 GMT Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 218 Vary: Accept-Encoding,User-Agent Public-Key-Pins: pin-sha256="gjSkx5Ton7CIpE+XpMyEQLiCYnDGbgsWzFNMT4ToilQ="; pin-sha256="gjSkx5Ton7CIpE+XpMyEQLiCYnDGbgsWzFNMT4ToilQ="; max-age=2592001; Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: text/html |
| WHOIS entry |
|---|
Tonic whoisd V1.1 emm ns1.ecentry.com emm ns2.ecentry.com |
Typos are not uncommon, not even with website addresses. More than that, the more popular the website, the more typos there tend to happen. We have gathered and generated the following list of most frequently encountered mistypes for emm.to:
Here is a list of some more reports for you to check. If you found this one on emm.to useful, the following list will be of interest to you, too:
This list contains 370 top level domain variantions for emm.to domain name: