Perhaps the most relevant statistics data that we could gather is presented here:
| Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
|---|---|---|
| Site title (meta) | Sportplanner SWSDH - Inloggen | Sticking to between 50-60 characters for meta title length is a good idea. The length of this website's meta title is 35. |
| Website meta description | A description has not been provided for this site. | The length of the meta description is 50 characters. Google recommends up to around 280-320 characters at the most. |
| Website load speed | Approximately 0.3281 seconds | Website load speed is on a good level, great! But if an improvement can be made, it's always for the better. |
| Rank by Alexa | 268,442 | We are not fans of the Alexa rank, but if we base our assumptions on it, the website is not that popular. |
| Homepage links | Approximately 2 | Such an amount of links on a homepage might raise a question or two. |
| Pages linking back | We counted 84 | Such a low amount of backlinks is insufficient and either shows the website is of low quality, or does not reach a wide audience. |
| Size of page HTML | 4KB | This is a very good result, as search engines prioritize websites that are quick to load. |
| Server data | Server seems to be online. IP adress for this domain is 37.153.225.214. | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. |
The basic overview not enough? Let's dive deeper.
A website is not just Quantcast ranks and meta information. There is a whole lot more to it. Let's give it a proper look now, shall we?
| Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
|---|---|---|
| Similar websites | wirelessdictionary.com gaussianwaves.com teletopix.org dsplog.com mobilecomms-technology.com |
While we can't speak with a hundred percent certainty, these website seem to fall into the same category as wirelesscommunication.nl. Thus, they probably target the same audience and, likely, keywords. |
Website safety is a key factor that should not be underestimated. After all, our computers and personal information stored on them are not as secure as one might think - the recent flaws found in microprocessors only confirm this. There is more than one source for finding out if a website is safe to visit or not, some more dependable than others. In this section we'll try to cover all the bases, if at all possible.
The following statistics are provided only as an approximation. We can't guarantee the numbers are absolutely correct, but we do believe they are very much within the ballpark and, as such, can give a pretty good idea about the popularity of this website.
Let's start with some telling numbers and then break it all down.
| Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
|---|---|---|
| Average visit time | 1:57 | Visitors spend a decent amount of time reading the website. |
Alexa, perhaps the oldest ranking system of its sort, bases it's website rating on approximated number of visitors of a specific page. In other words, the more visitors, the higher the global and local ranks. As of recently, Alexa has well over four million websites ranked. Having said all that, Alexa rank should be taken with a grain of salt. Or a massive bucketload. In other words, we think it to be greatly overrated, as it never takes into account how popular a website is within its niche.
What is a server? It's basically a physical storage device (one that, sometimes, makes up several virtual servers for the cheaper shared hosting) that holds all the files and databases associated with a specific website or websites. Obviously, it's a touch more complicated than that (servers also have processors), but the essence is quite simple - your browser contacts the server, which then sends all the neccessary information and files to your computer. Each physical server has a unique IP address assigned to it, too, for easy recognition.
If you need more raw data, here's what we managed to gather:
| Header information |
|---|
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Cache-Control: private,no-store,must-revalidate Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5 X-AspNetMvc-Version: 3.0 X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319 X-Powered-By: ASP.NET p3p: CP="NOI ADM DEV PSAi COM NAV OUR OTR STP IND DEM" Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 03:20:11 GMT Content-Length: 4066 |
| WHOIS entry |
|---|
Domain name: wirelesscommunication.nl Status: active Registrar: NameWeb Zakstraat 44b RANST Belgium DNSSEC: no Domain nameservers: dns11.per.nl dns12.per.nl Record maintained by: NL Domain Registry Copyright notice No part of this publication may be reproduced, published, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of the Foundation for Internet Domain Registration in the Netherlands (SIDN). These restrictions apply equally to registrars, except in that reproductions and publications are permitted insofar as they are reasonable, necessary and solely in the context of the registration activities referred to in the General Terms and Conditions for .nl Registrars. Any use of this material for advertising, targeting commercial offers or similar activities is explicitly forbidden and liable to result in legal action. Anyone who is aware or suspects that such activities are taking place is asked to inform the Foundation for Internet Domain Registration in the Netherlands. (c) The Foundation for Internet Domain Registration in the Netherlands (SIDN) Dutch Copyright Act, protection of authors' rights (Section 10, subsection 1, clause 1). |
Typos are not uncommon, not even with website addresses. More than that, the more popular the website, the more typos there tend to happen. We have gathered and generated the following list of most frequently encountered mistypes for wirelesscommunication.nl:
Here is a list of some more reports for you to check. If you found this one on wirelesscommunication.nl useful, the following list will be of interest to you, too:
This list contains 370 top level domain variantions for wirelesscommunication.nl domain name: