Perhaps the most relevant statistics data that we could gather is presented here:
Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
---|---|---|
Site title (meta) | Visually | Premium Content Creation for Better Marketing | Sticking to between 50-60 characters for meta title length is a good idea. The length of this website's meta title is 56. |
Website meta description | A community platform for data visualization and infographics. Also offers products and resources. | The length of the meta description is 97 characters. Google recommends up to around 280-320 characters at the most. |
Website load speed | Approximately 1.2464 seconds | Website load speed is on a good level, great! But if an improvement can be made, it's always for the better. |
Rank by Alexa | 17,958 | The site is among the more popular ones, according to Alexa. How accurate the rank is remains a question. |
Global rank by Quantcast | 3,932, after last update | According to Quantcast, the website is very well known. |
Pages linking back | We counted 15,497 | A great amount of backlinks. |
Size of page HTML | 29.7KB | This is a very good result, as search engines prioritize websites that are quick to load. |
Server data | Server seems to be online. IP adress for this domain is 52.7.61.155. | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. |
The basic overview not enough? Let's dive deeper.
A website is not just Quantcast ranks and meta information. There is a whole lot more to it. Let's give it a proper look now, shall we?
Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
---|---|---|
Categories of the website | Arts Illustration Specialized Technical and Infographics |
These are not only the possible categories the website falls into, but also areas of interest of the main target audience. |
Similar websites | piktochart.com venngage.com easel.ly diigo.com newsvine.com |
While we can't speak with a hundred percent certainty, these website seem to fall into the same category as visual.ly. Thus, they probably target the same audience and, likely, keywords. |
The following statistics are provided only as an approximation. We can't guarantee the numbers are absolutely correct, but we do believe they are very much within the ballpark and, as such, can give a pretty good idea about the popularity of this website.
Let's start with some telling numbers and then break it all down.
Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
---|---|---|
Average visit time | 2:48 | Visitors spend a decent amount of time reading the website. |
Alexa, perhaps the oldest ranking system of its sort, bases it's website rating on approximated number of visitors of a specific page. In other words, the more visitors, the higher the global and local ranks. As of recently, Alexa has well over four million websites ranked. Having said all that, Alexa rank should be taken with a grain of salt. Or a massive bucketload. In other words, we think it to be greatly overrated, as it never takes into account how popular a website is within its niche.
QUANTCAST is very similar to Alexa, though perhaps enjoys an overall better user opinion even if, by comparison, the data processing company's rank index is smaller. The main interest of QUANTCAST is real-time audience analysis, so again the rank is based on traffic. QUANTCAST gathers this data mainly for advertising purposes of other companies. We know that, so far, QUANTCAST has ranked 2,741,224 websites, give or take a few. With all of this said, Quantcast rank is not really any more useful than that of Alexa and most similar ranking systems. Few of them, if any, take context into account and rate websites purely on traffic numbers (guesstimated, in so many cases). It's by far not the most accurate representation of a website's worth.
What is a server? It's basically a physical storage device (one that, sometimes, makes up several virtual servers for the cheaper shared hosting) that holds all the files and databases associated with a specific website or websites. Obviously, it's a touch more complicated than that (servers also have processors), but the essence is quite simple - your browser contacts the server, which then sends all the neccessary information and files to your computer. Each physical server has a unique IP address assigned to it, too, for easy recognition.
If you need more raw data, here's what we managed to gather:
Header information |
---|
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: nginx Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:01:41 GMT Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Set-Cookie: SSESS874ec3a72fac42f9430bcb6a8b9f2b48=3n4e75h97fo8al4al98mt4o0f2; expires=Sat, 02-Dec-2017 05:35:01 GMT; Max-Age=200000; path=/; domain=.visual.ly Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate Pragma: no-cache |
WHOIS entry |
---|
Registrant: Visually Domain Admin 77 Geary St San Francisco CA US - United States Zip/Postal code: 94108 Phone: 4155486466 Domain Name: visual.ly Created: 2010-06-06 11:29:36 Updated: 2015-02-26 23:07:05 Expired: 2027-06-06 11:29:36 Domain servers in listed order: ns4.libyanspider.com ns3.libyanspider.com ns2.libyanspider.com ns1.libyanspider.com Domain Status: ACTIVE -- Whois information provided by: LY Registry whois.nic.ly -For Whois usage policy please check: http://whois.nic.ly/policy.php |
Typos are not uncommon, not even with website addresses. More than that, the more popular the website, the more typos there tend to happen. We have gathered and generated the following list of most frequently encountered mistypes for visual.ly:
Here is a list of some more reports for you to check. If you found this one on visual.ly useful, the following list will be of interest to you, too:
This list contains 370 top level domain variantions for visual.ly domain name: