Perhaps the most relevant statistics data that we could gather is presented here:
Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
---|---|---|
Site title (meta) | MIT Technology Review | Sticking to between 50-60 characters for meta title length is a good idea. The length of this website's meta title is 21. |
Website meta description | MIT's magazine about innovation, with online articles on specific technologies and a focus on the process by which new technology gets out of the lab and into the marketplace. | The length of the meta description is 175 characters. Google recommends up to around 280-320 characters at the most. |
Website load speed | Approximately 1.2707 seconds | Website load speed is on a good level, great! But if an improvement can be made, it's always for the better. |
Rank by Alexa | 8,510 | The website is very well known according to Alexa. Take that for what it's worth. |
Global rank by Quantcast | 4,398, after last update | According to Quantcast, the website is very well known. |
Homepage links | Approximately 208 | A good amount of links and nothing to worry about. |
Pages linking back | We counted 11,571 | A great amount of backlinks. |
Size of page HTML | 73.8KB | This is a very good result, as search engines prioritize websites that are quick to load. |
Server data | Server seems to be online. IP adress for this domain is 184.73.245.212. | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. |
Status of domain | Date of registry: 1998-02-23 05:00:00 | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. technologyreview.com has been registered at NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. |
The basic overview not enough? Let's dive deeper.
A website is not just Quantcast ranks and meta information. There is a whole lot more to it. Let's give it a proper look now, shall we?
Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
---|---|---|
Categories of the website | Science Technology Publications Journals and Magazines |
These are not only the possible categories the website falls into, but also areas of interest of the main target audience. |
Similar websites | arstechnica.com cnn.com en.wikipedia.org eweek.com extremetech.com gizmag.com gizmodo.com nytimes.com pcmag.com popsci.com reddit.com reuters.com slashdot.org thefutureofthings.com theguardian.com time.com twitter.com wired.com |
While we can't speak with a hundred percent certainty, these website seem to fall into the same category as technologyreview.com. Thus, they probably target the same audience and, likely, keywords. |
Commonly visited | yusukematsui.me centauri-dreams.org mercadolaboral.pr.gov estadisticas.gobierno.pr salud.gov.pr |
Frequent visitors of technologyreview.com are also interested in these websites. |
Website safety is a key factor that should not be underestimated. After all, our computers and personal information stored on them are not as secure as one might think - the recent flaws found in microprocessors only confirm this. There is more than one source for finding out if a website is safe to visit or not, some more dependable than others. In this section we'll try to cover all the bases, if at all possible.
The following statistics are provided only as an approximation. We can't guarantee the numbers are absolutely correct, but we do believe they are very much within the ballpark and, as such, can give a pretty good idea about the popularity of this website.
Let's start with some telling numbers and then break it all down.
Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
---|---|---|
Approximate monthly visitors | 6.86M | Without taking the size of the target audience into account, we would say the website's not that popular. But, again, that is a somewhat superficial assessment - make your own conclusions. |
Traffic delta | +42.89% | Over the past month, the traffic has increased. |
Average visit time | 00:01:26 | Visitors spend a decent amount of time reading the website. |
technologyreview.com Visit Traffic Bounce Rate | 74.66% | A pretty good amount of visitors find valuable information here without going back to search results. |
Alexa, perhaps the oldest ranking system of its sort, bases it's website rating on approximated number of visitors of a specific page. In other words, the more visitors, the higher the global and local ranks. As of recently, Alexa has well over four million websites ranked. Having said all that, Alexa rank should be taken with a grain of salt. Or a massive bucketload. In other words, we think it to be greatly overrated, as it never takes into account how popular a website is within its niche.
QUANTCAST is very similar to Alexa, though perhaps enjoys an overall better user opinion even if, by comparison, the data processing company's rank index is smaller. The main interest of QUANTCAST is real-time audience analysis, so again the rank is based on traffic. QUANTCAST gathers this data mainly for advertising purposes of other companies. We know that, so far, QUANTCAST has ranked 2,388,207 websites, give or take a few. With all of this said, Quantcast rank is not really any more useful than that of Alexa and most similar ranking systems. Few of them, if any, take context into account and rate websites purely on traffic numbers (guesstimated, in so many cases). It's by far not the most accurate representation of a website's worth.
What is a server? It's basically a physical storage device (one that, sometimes, makes up several virtual servers for the cheaper shared hosting) that holds all the files and databases associated with a specific website or websites. Obviously, it's a touch more complicated than that (servers also have processors), but the essence is quite simple - your browser contacts the server, which then sends all the neccessary information and files to your computer. Each physical server has a unique IP address assigned to it, too, for easy recognition.
If you need more raw data, here's what we managed to gather:
Header information |
---|
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:17:05 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) Location: http://www.technologyreview.com/ Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Length: 326 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: nginx Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 X-Drupal-Cache: HIT Etag: "1454331067-1" Content-Language: en X-Generator: Drupal 7 (http://drupal.org) Link: <http://www.technologyreview.com/>; rel="canonical",<http://www.technologyreview.com/>; rel="shortlink" Cache-Control: public, max-age=3600 Last-Modified: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:51:07 GMT Expires: Sun, 19 Nov 1978 05:00:00 GMT Vary: Cookie,Accept-Encoding X-Request-ID: v-c92dba1a-c8e3-11e5-b607-22000aaa2013 X-AH-Environment: prod Transfer-Encoding: chunked Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:17:05 GMT X-Varnish: 2247071123 2246756449 Age: 989 Via: 1.1 varnish Connection: keep-alive X-Cache: HIT X-Cache-Hits: 486 |
WHOIS entry |
---|
Whois Server Version 2.0 Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net for detailed information. Domain Name: TECHNOLOGYREVIEW.COM Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 2 Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com Referral URL: http://networksolutions.com Name Server: NS1.P08.DYNECT.NET Name Server: NS2.P08.DYNECT.NET Name Server: NS3.P08.DYNECT.NET Name Server: NS4.P08.DYNECT.NET Status: clientTransferProhibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited Updated Date: 18-apr-2012 Creation Date: 23-feb-1998 Expiration Date: 22-feb-2022 >>> Last update of whois database: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:16:59 GMT <<< For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration. TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone, or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation, repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and Registrars. |
Typos are not uncommon, not even with website addresses. More than that, the more popular the website, the more typos there tend to happen. We have gathered and generated the following list of most frequently encountered mistypes for technologyreview.com:
Here is a list of some more reports for you to check. If you found this one on technologyreview.com useful, the following list will be of interest to you, too:
This list contains 370 top level domain variantions for technologyreview.com domain name: