Perhaps the most relevant statistics data that we could gather is presented here:
Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
---|---|---|
Site title (meta) | [ARCHIVED CONTENT] Internet Memory Research – Web Archive Access | Sticking to between 50-60 characters for meta title length is a good idea. The length of this website's meta title is 64. |
Website meta description | IMF Access Framework, easy access to web archives | The length of the meta description is 49 characters. Google recommends up to around 280-320 characters at the most. |
Website load speed | Approximately 0.2804 seconds | Website load speed is on a good level, great! But if an improvement can be made, it's always for the better. |
Rank by Alexa | 989,409 | We are not fans of the Alexa rank, but if we base our assumptions on it, the website is not that popular. |
Global rank by Quantcast | 113,598, after last update | According to Quantcast metris, the website is quite popular. |
Homepage links | Approximately 18 | A good amount of links and nothing to worry about. |
Size of page HTML | 27.4KB | This is a very good result, as search engines prioritize websites that are quick to load. |
Server data | Server seems to be online. IP adress for this domain is 37.16.72.9. | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. |
The basic overview not enough? Let's dive deeper.
Alexa, perhaps the oldest ranking system of its sort, bases it's website rating on approximated number of visitors of a specific page. In other words, the more visitors, the higher the global and local ranks. As of recently, Alexa has well over four million websites ranked. Having said all that, Alexa rank should be taken with a grain of salt. Or a massive bucketload. In other words, we think it to be greatly overrated, as it never takes into account how popular a website is within its niche.
QUANTCAST is very similar to Alexa, though perhaps enjoys an overall better user opinion even if, by comparison, the data processing company's rank index is smaller. The main interest of QUANTCAST is real-time audience analysis, so again the rank is based on traffic. QUANTCAST gathers this data mainly for advertising purposes of other companies. We know that, so far, QUANTCAST has ranked 7,047,049 websites, give or take a few. With all of this said, Quantcast rank is not really any more useful than that of Alexa and most similar ranking systems. Few of them, if any, take context into account and rate websites purely on traffic numbers (guesstimated, in so many cases). It's by far not the most accurate representation of a website's worth.
What is a server? It's basically a physical storage device (one that, sometimes, makes up several virtual servers for the cheaper shared hosting) that holds all the files and databases associated with a specific website or websites. Obviously, it's a touch more complicated than that (servers also have processors), but the essence is quite simple - your browser contacts the server, which then sends all the neccessary information and files to your computer. Each physical server has a unique IP address assigned to it, too, for easy recognition.
If you need more raw data, here's what we managed to gather:
Header information |
---|
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 14:05:32 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.10 Link: <http://webarchive.nrscotland.gov.uk/20170106021747/http://www.nas.gov.uk/>; rel="memento"; datetime="Fri, 06 Jan 2017 02:17:47 GMT", <http://webarchive.nrscotland.gov.uk/20170106021747/http://www.nas.gov.uk/>; rel="first memento"; datetime="Fri, 06 Jan 2017 02:17:47 GMT", <http://webarchive.nrscotland.gov.uk/20170106021747/http://www.nas.gov.uk/>; rel="last memento"; datetime="Fri, 06 Jan 2017 02:17:47 GMT", <http://webarchive.nrscotland.gov.uk/20170106021747/http://www.nas.gov.uk/>; rel="prev memento"; datetime="Fri, 06 Jan 2017 02:17:47 GMT", <http://webarchive.nrscotland.gov.uk/20170106021747/http://www.nas.gov.uk/>; rel="next memento"; datetime="Fri, 06 Jan 2017 02:17:47 GMT", <http://webarchive.nrscotland.gov.uk/timegate/http://www.nas.gov.uk/>; rel="timegate", <http://www.nas.gov.uk/>; rel="original", <http://webarchive.nrscotland.gov.uk/timemap/http://www.nas.gov.uk/>; rel="timemap"; type="application/link-format" Memento-Datetime: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 02:17:47 GMT Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 cache-control: max-age=86400 X-Varnish: 25735581 10209984 Age: 51836 Via: 1.1 varnish-v4 Transfer-Encoding: chunked Connection: keep-alive Accept-Ranges: bytes |
WHOIS entry |
---|
Domain: nas.gov.uk Registered For: National Archive of Scotland Domain Owner: The National Archives of Scotland Registered By: GX Networks Servers: auth1.dns.gxn.net auth2.dns.gxn.net auth3.dns.gxn.net auth4.dns.gxn.net Registrant Contact: John Mooney Registrant Address: Ladywell House Ladywell Road Corstorphine EDINBURGH EH12 7TF United Kingdom +44 131 314 4214 (Phone) +44 131 314 4344 (FAX) john. Renewal date: Monday 28th Nov 2016 Entry updated: Wednesday 29th July 2015 Entry created: Wednesday 17th September 2003 |
Typos are not uncommon, not even with website addresses. More than that, the more popular the website, the more typos there tend to happen. We have gathered and generated the following list of most frequently encountered mistypes for nas.gov.uk:
Here is a list of some more reports for you to check. If you found this one on nas.gov.uk useful, the following list will be of interest to you, too:
This list contains 370 top level domain variantions for nas.gov.uk domain name: