Perhaps the most relevant statistics data that we could gather is presented here:
| Data type/Website parameter | Status or value | Our findings |
|---|---|---|
| Site title (meta) | Jim Reed Photography - Extreme Weather | Sticking to between 50-60 characters for meta title length is a good idea. The length of this website's meta title is 38. |
| Website meta description | Extreme weather photographer Jim Reed has been taking photos of climate change and record-setting storms in America for 25 consecutive years. | The length of the meta description is 141 characters. Google recommends up to around 280-320 characters at the most. |
| Website load speed | Approximately 1.7883 seconds | It takes too long to load the website – we would suggest the webmaster to look into it. |
| Global rank by Quantcast | 701,945, after last update | Based on the gathered data, Quantcast does not consider this website to be popular. Take it for what it's worth. |
| Homepage links | Approximately 67 | A good amount of links and nothing to worry about. |
| Size of page HTML | 50.2KB | If it were up to us, we'd urge the webmaster to improve. The result isn't very good, you see. Just saying. |
| Server data | Server seems to be online. IP adress for this domain is 64.62.158.18. | Due to lack of data, we can't provide a meaningful insight. |
The basic overview not enough? Let's dive deeper.
QUANTCAST is very similar to Alexa, though perhaps enjoys an overall better user opinion even if, by comparison, the data processing company's rank index is smaller. The main interest of QUANTCAST is real-time audience analysis, so again the rank is based on traffic. QUANTCAST gathers this data mainly for advertising purposes of other companies. We know that, so far, QUANTCAST has ranked 126,088,472 websites, give or take a few. With all of this said, Quantcast rank is not really any more useful than that of Alexa and most similar ranking systems. Few of them, if any, take context into account and rate websites purely on traffic numbers (guesstimated, in so many cases). It's by far not the most accurate representation of a website's worth.
What is a server? It's basically a physical storage device (one that, sometimes, makes up several virtual servers for the cheaper shared hosting) that holds all the files and databases associated with a specific website or websites. Obviously, it's a touch more complicated than that (servers also have processors), but the essence is quite simple - your browser contacts the server, which then sends all the neccessary information and files to your computer. Each physical server has a unique IP address assigned to it, too, for easy recognition.
If you need more raw data, here's what we managed to gather:
| Header information |
|---|
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Cache-Control: private, must-revalidate, pre-check=0, post-check=0, max-age=1 Content-Length: 51381 Content-Type: text/html ETag: "d742301e" Edge-Control: no-store X-CPU-Time: 6.0015 Set-Cookie: zf_5y_visitor=MtAXRKCGEzt7UudD1z5w_T5LiUcAAAAAcsF8F22eM7Lb; expires=Thu, 29-Apr-2027 05:16:11 GMT; path=/ Set-Cookie: zf_edgeauth=~~access=/cdn/pub/o3ts50pxpnd9/*~md5=f95e51679f4c91f225cc62d95d87c08e; path=/cdn/pub/o3ts50pxpnd9 Set-Cookie: zf_pat=55994786$jimreed$www.jimreedphoto.com$340540780$207534790; path=/ Set-Cookie: zf_cdo=jimreed; expires=Thu, 29-Apr-2027 05:16:11 GMT; path=/ Set-Cookie: zf_lsc=vvqBp3aWGn2mGff6m622wn0f...0; path=/ X-Origin: WS003 Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 05:16:11 GMT |
Typos are not uncommon, not even with website addresses. More than that, the more popular the website, the more typos there tend to happen. We have gathered and generated the following list of most frequently encountered mistypes for jimreedphoto.com:
Here is a list of some more reports for you to check. If you found this one on jimreedphoto.com useful, the following list will be of interest to you, too:
This list contains 370 top level domain variantions for jimreedphoto.com domain name: